Also Included In: Cancer / Oncology;??Medical Devices / Diagnostics
Article Date: 09 May 2013 - 1:00 PDT Current ratings for:
The Many Benefits Of Robot-Assisted Kidney Cancer Surgery Do Not Include Cost
Robot-assisted surgery to remove kidney cancers has seen a rapid increase in use, and has both replaced and proven safer than laparoscopic procedures for the same purpose, according to a study by the Vattikuti Urology Institute at Henry Ford Hospital in Detroit.
However, the study also shows that robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN) - while resulting in fewer complications than both open (OPN) and laparoscopic (LPN) removal of cancerous kidney tissue - also involves more "excessive" hospital charges.
"Excessive hospital charges were significantly higher with robotic partial nephrectomy," says Khurshid R. Ghani, M.D., of Vattikuti Urology Institute and lead author of the study. "While we can report no cost-savings with the procedure - quite the opposite - the benefits are obvious."
"It is a safe operation that has rapidly replaced LPN as the most common minimally invasive approach for partial nephrectomy. It has shown superior results compared to open surgery, and was better than laparoscopy in every respect but cost," he adds
The findings were presented at the annual meeting of the American Urological Association in San Diego.
Dr. Ghani says data was mined from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS), which includes inpatient discharge information from 1,044 U.S. hospitals.
Between October 2008 - when the NIS first included an identifier for robot-assisted procedures - and December 2010, the researchers found a total of 38,064 patients who underwent OPN, LPN or RPN to treat kidney cancers that had not metastasized.
Of the total, nearly 70 percent had open surgery, nearly 24 percent had robot-assisted surgery and a little more than 9 percent were treated laparoscopically.
Researchers also noted that while all three forms of kidney surgery had increased in 2010, robot-assisted partial nephrectomy soared by more than 45 percent, far overshadowing the other two types.
Complications were tracked during and after each procedure. The Henry Ford team found: Patients undergoing RPN were least likely to receive a blood transfusion, while those who had open surgery were most likely to need one. The same was true for developing complications after surgery or requiring a prolonged hospital stay. Only those undergoing RPN were less likely to develop complications during surgery.Article adapted by Medical News Today from original press release. Click 'references' tab above for source.
Visit our urology / nephrology section for the latest news on this subject. Funding source: Henry Ford Hospital
Henry Ford Health System Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:
MLA
13 May. 2013.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
'The Many Benefits Of Robot-Assisted Kidney Cancer Surgery Do Not Include Cost'
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.
No comments:
Post a Comment