DM

Showing posts with label Despite. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Despite. Show all posts

Friday, August 9, 2013

Despite Recommendations Against it, Men Still Plan to Get PSA Tests

Washington, DC (PRWEB) July 09, 2013

Men plan to continue getting prostate-specific antigen (PSA) tests despite recommendations that suggests men should not be screened, according to a new study by researchers at RTI International.

In October 2011, the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force, an independent panel of experts in primary care and prevention, released a new recommendation advising men against getting a PSA test, which screens for prostate cancer. The task force concluded that many men are harmed as a result of prostate cancer screening and few, if any, benefit.

The study, published as an early release of the August issue of the American Journal of Preventive Medicine, surveyed 1,089 men who did not have a history of prostate cancer and were 40 to 74 years old. The survey, conducted about one month after the task force released the new recommendation, measured men’s initial response to the recommendation. Men were shown the recommendation and asked to what extent they agreed or disagreed with it and when/if they planned to get a PSA test. Men were also asked whether or not they were confident that the recommendation was based on the latest research.

The researchers found that despite the fact that most participants (61 percent) agreed with the new PSA testing recommendation and were confident that the recommendation was based on the latest research (69 percent), only 13 percent intended to follow it and not get a PSA test. More than half of men (54 percent) surveyed still plan to get a PSA test in the future, and one-third of participants were undecided.

“Since cancer screening has been promoted as a way to save lives, this recommendation may seem counterintuitive to many people,” said Linda Squiers, Ph.D., senior health communication scientist at RTI and the paper's lead author.

Men who were in their 50s were significantly more likely than men in their 40s to disagree with the recommendation not to get screened. Black men, men with higher incomes, those who had had a PSA in the previous two years, and men who were somewhat or very worried about getting prostate cancer were also more likely to say they will not follow the new recommendation.

More than 70 percent of participants did not discuss the potential benefits or harm of screening with their healthcare provider. Those who did remember such a discussion only remember hearing of the benefits of testing.

"We need to do a better job of presenting both the benefits and harms of screening to all patients and explaining the science behind the recommendation in plain language so everyone can understand it," Squiers said.

In May 2013, the American Urological Association altered its position, recommending against routine screening among men age 40 to 54 years and age 70 and older, but it continues to advocate for informed decision-making for men age 55 to 69 years.

-end-

About RTI International
RTI International is one of the world's leading research institutes, dedicated to improving the human condition by turning knowledge into practice. Our staff of more than 3,700 provides research and technical services to governments and businesses in more than 75 countries in the areas of health and pharmaceuticals, education and training, surveys and statistics, advanced technology, international development, economic and social policy, energy and the environment, and laboratory testing and chemical analysis. For more information, visit http://www.rti.org.



View the original article here

Thursday, June 13, 2013

Symptoms Of Burnout Suffered By Many US Oncologists Despite High Career Satisfaction

Main Category: Primary Care / General Practice
Also Included In: Cancer / Oncology;??Psychology / Psychiatry
Article Date: 04 Jun 2013 - 0:00 PDT Current ratings for:
Symptoms Of Burnout Suffered By Many US Oncologists Despite High Career Satisfaction
not yet ratednot yet rated
Even though a majority of U.S. oncologists report satisfaction with their careers, many say they have experienced at least one symptom of burnout, a Mayo Clinic-led study has found. The study was released during the American Society of Clinical Oncology's annual meeting in Chicago.

"Oncology can be a tremendously rewarding area of medicine, but caring for patients with cancer is also demanding and stressful," says lead author Tait Shanafelt, M.D., a Mayo Clinic hematologist/oncologist. "Oncologists work long hours, supervise the administration of highly toxic therapy, and continually observe death and suffering, so it is important to study the issues of burnout and career satisfaction."

The study, based on a national survey of 3,000 oncologists who were members of ASCO between October 2012 and January 2013, found that 45 percent of oncologists had at least one symptom of burnout. Those symptoms included emotional exhaustion and depersonalization as measured using the Maslach Burnout Inventory, a tool that is used to evaluate the effects of stress on medical professionals and workers in other fields.

At the same time, 83 percent of oncologists said they were satisfied with their career. The survey sample included an equal number of men and women and an equal proportion of individuals from all career stages. The survey used validated tools to assess feelings of burnout and well-being.

Among responders, 34 percent practiced in academic medical centers and 43 percent were in private practice. The rest worked in the military, with veterans or in industry. Oncologists worked an average of 51 hours per week and saw a mean of 51 outpatients per week.

Although the average number of hours worked by oncologists in academic medical centers and private practice were similar, there were significant differences in other practice characteristics such as sub-specialization within the field of oncology. Eighty-one percent of oncologists in academic medical centers reported focusing on caring for patients with a specific type of cancer, compared to 17 percent of oncologists in private practice.

Oncologists working at academic centers also devoted a much greater proportion of their time to research and educating future oncologists, while those in private practice spent most of their time on patient care. These differences translated into a difference in the number of patients seen per week by practice setting. Oncologists in academic medical centers reported caring for an average of 37 cancer patients per week, compared to the 74 patients seen each week by oncologists in private practice.

The authors recommend further research to identify personal and professional characteristics associated with burnout and career satisfaction.

Article adapted by Medical News Today from original press release. Click 'references' tab above for source.
Visit our primary care / general practice section for the latest news on this subject. Co-authors include Jeff Sloan, Ph.D., of Mayo Clinic; Bill Gradishar, M.D., of Northwestern University; Michael Kosty, M.D., of Scripps Green Hospital; Helen Chew, M.D., of University of California Davis; Leora Horn, M.D., and Marilyn Raymond, Ph.D., of Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center; Quyen Chu, M.D., of Louisiana State University; and John Pippen, M.D., of Texas Oncology, Dallas.
Mayo Clinic Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

MLA

Clinic, Mayo. "Symptoms Of Burnout Suffered By Many US Oncologists Despite High Career Satisfaction." Medical News Today. MediLexicon, Intl., 4 Jun. 2013. Web.
5 Jun. 2013. APA

Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.


'Symptoms Of Burnout Suffered By Many US Oncologists Despite High Career Satisfaction'

Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.

If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.

All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)

Contact Our News Editors

For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.

Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:

Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.



View the original article here

Sunday, May 26, 2013

Bladder Cancer Could Reoccur Despite Bladder Removal

Main Category: Urology / Nephrology
Also Included In: Cancer / Oncology
Article Date: 10 May 2013 - 0:00 PDT Current ratings for:
Bladder Cancer Could Reoccur Despite Bladder Removal
not yet ratednot yet rated
Patients with advanced bladder cancers that are surgically removed might need additional therapy to prevent recurrence in certain situations, a new UT Southwestern Medical Center study suggests.

The five-year international study led by researchers at UT Southwestern validates the use of a marker panel to predict which patients are more likely to have a recurrence of cancer after bladder removal, thereby identifying those patients as good candidates for follow-up chemotherapy.

The findings, published in the most recent edition of European Urology, are important because additional molecular information could help bladder-cancer patients and their physicians decide whether administering further toxic chemotherapy is worth the risk, said Dr. Yair Lotan, professor of urology at UT Southwestern and the study's primary investigator and first author.

Bladder cancer is the fourth most common cancer diagnosed in men, according to the American Cancer Society. The ACS estimates that more than 72,500 cases will be diagnosed in the United States this year, and that more than 15,200 people will die from the disease in 2013.

Patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer typically are treated by removing all or part of the bladder (a cystectomy procedure) but are infrequently given additional chemotherapy, despite an overall relapse rate of one in every three cases.

Using five commercially available markers and the tissues of patients who had their bladders removed, UT Southwestern researchers in the departments of urology and pathology and the Harold C. Simmons Cancer Center monitored a group of 216 patients to track if their cancers recurred.

When controlled for pathologic factors such as stage, grade, lymphovascular invasion, lymph node status, surgical margin status, and whether the patients had already received chemotherapy, the number of altered biomarkers were found to be an independent predictor of recurrence and cancer-specific mortality, the researchers found.

"It is well known that bladder cancer tumors have certain molecular alterations, but the problem is that there has been little data regarding which patients should get additional therapy, especially if there is no radiologic or pathologic evidence that the cancer has spread beyond the bladder," Dr. Lotan said. "This situation exists despite the fact that approximately 35 percent of patients treated by cystectomy develop metastatic disease and many of these individuals die of their disease."

The investigation's goal was to establish whether molecular markers that are involved in cell cycle regulation and proliferation could help identify those patients at higher risk for recurrence or metastasis following bladder-cancer surgery, Dr. Lotan said.

The next steps will be to try to incorporate the molecular marker panel into clinical practice. Dr. Lotan is also a member of the Simmons Cancer Center.

Article adapted by Medical News Today from original press release. Click 'references' tab above for source.
Visit our urology / nephrology section for the latest news on this subject. Other UT Southwestern researchers involved in the study are Dr. Arthur Sagalowsky, professor of urology and surgery; Dr. Ganesh Raj, associate professor of urology; Dr. Payal Kapur, associate professor of pathology; Dr. Vitaly Margulis, assistant professor of urology; Dr. Yull Arriaga, assistant professor of internal medicine; Dr. Aditya Bagrodia, urology resident; and medical student Varun Rachakonda. Medical oncologists and urologists from NewYork-Presbyterian/Weill Cornell Medical Center; the University Vita-Salute San Raffaele in Milan, Italy; and the University of Heidelberg’s Mannheim Medical Center in Germany also contributed to the research.
Please visit the Harold C. Simmons Cancer Center to learn more about clinical services for oncology at UT Southwestern, including highly individualized treatments for cancer at the region’s only National Cancer Institute-designated center.
UT Southwestern Medical Center Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

MLA

UT Southwestern Medical Center. "Bladder Cancer Could Reoccur Despite Bladder Removal." Medical News Today. MediLexicon, Intl., 10 May. 2013. Web.
13 May. 2013. APA

Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.


'Bladder Cancer Could Reoccur Despite Bladder Removal'

Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.

If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.

All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)

Contact Our News Editors

For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.

Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:

Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.



View the original article here